Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:50:55 -0700
From:      Julio Merino <jmmv@freebsd.org>
To:        =?UTF-8?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r263346 - in head: etc/mtree tools/build/mk tools/regression/usr.bin/make usr.bin/make usr.bin/make/tests usr.bin/make/tests/archives/fmt_44bsd usr.bin/make/tests/archives/fmt_44bsd_mod...
Message-ID:  <CAFY7cWAR9=FMRxEkeU=O29r9O8Gzxewt4FdTZqKfj%2BdRM8WeLA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFY7cWB8oPm91ye4gtZBfFHXjRLXw07_TsyPQof7BycCrSLaGA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201403191229.s2JCTLDp024608@svn.freebsd.org> <864n2mxpun.fsf@nine.des.no> <CAFY7cWB8oPm91ye4gtZBfFHXjRLXw07_TsyPQof7BycCrSLaGA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Julio Merino <jmmv@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> w=
rote:
>> Julio Merino <jmmv@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>>> Log:
>>>   Migrate tools/regression/usr.bin/make/ to the new tests layout.
>>>
>>>   Note that these tests are for fmake, not bmake, and thus they are not
>>>   installed nor run when bmake is selected (the default).  Yes, I have
>>>   wasted a *ton* of time on moving tests for no real reason other than
>>>   ensuring they are not left behind.
>>>
>>>   But maybe, just maybe, it was not work in vain: the majority of these
>>>   tests also work with bmake and the few that don't may point at broken
>>>   stuff.  For example, the tests for the "archive" feature do not work
>>>   with bmake, but bmake's manpage and source tree seem to imply that th=
ey
>>>   should.  So... to be investigated later; need to poke sjg@.
>>
>> This, or a subsequent but related commit, broke the WITHOUT_BMAKE build:
>
> Apologies for not having gotten to this yet. Will try to deal with it
> during the weekend or next week when I'm back home. (Still traveling
> after AsiaBSDCon and been focusing on fixing some other issues in the
> testing cluster.)

Finally got to this. Just committed r264742 which will hopefully fix it.

> In the meantime: could someone enlighten me as to why !bmake is still sup=
ported?

Question still stands.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFY7cWAR9=FMRxEkeU=O29r9O8Gzxewt4FdTZqKfj%2BdRM8WeLA>