Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:14:44 -0700 From: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> To: tlambert2@mindspring.com Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, Mike Heffner <mheffner@vt.edu>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Importing lukemftpd Message-ID: <20010720171444.ABD0B3E2F@bazooka.unixfreak.org> In-Reply-To: <3B585D99.60A9C4C6@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on "Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:34:33 -0700"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> writes: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > Are you now holding all daemon hostage? I think you're being > > > > > too strong on this statement. If this is going to be the case, > > > > > please document that from now on daemon changes (or new ones) > > > > > must be pre-approved by the S.O. > > > > > > > > You're being facetious. > > > > > > A little. But I do find that your power play seems to be arbitrarily > > > applied to LukeM ftpd. > > > > There haven't been any other cases of similar impact recently for me > > to stand up and do my thing over. If someone wanted to -- say -- > > commit a replacement IPv4 stack which had been rewritten from scratch, > > or a rewritten inetd, etc, then I'd be saying the exact same thing. > > Suggestion: make the old ftpd a port, if the NetBSD one is > going to be default, since there are additional features, > and it has been security audited. I, for one, will be keeping > it around. This is a good idea. I'll do it unless somebody else wants to. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010720171444.ABD0B3E2F>