Date: 22 Feb 1997 02:37:37 GMT From: peter@spinner.DIALix.COM (Peter Wemm) To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing sources under gdb? Message-ID: <856579057.712508@haywire.DIALix.COM> References: <199702212145.IAA28080@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <199702212202.QAA06337@jupiter.mcs.net>, karl@Mcs.Net (Karl Denninger) writes: >> >> Karl Denninger stands accused of saying: >> > > >> > > Try 'cvs update 'Pd'. Gdb has moved, and you're not cleaning it out >> > > correctly. This has been discussed here at least half a dozen times >> > > in the last three or so weeks. >> > >> > That's "cvs update -Pd", right? [..] >> > No change. If I REMOVE it and use "cvs update ." it comes right back where >> > it was. Is my CVS tree wrecked? I even went back and cvsup'd again, just >> > to make sure I'm current -- I am. [..] > Did that, didn't change a thing. > > The -Pd should REMOVE irrelavent things, right? So if gdb has moved, why is > this library directory (and the rest of it) still there? You are remembering to update src/contrib/gdb as well, aren't you? If so, check your .depend files, they often have the old pathnames and do not adapt to the .PATH settings in Makefile automatically. Do a 'make cleandepend' to be sure. The bulk of the gdb code moved from gnu/usr.bin/gdb to src/contrib/gdb and the remaining files are bmake glue to build it in a way compatable with the general build system. -Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?856579057.712508>