Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 18:46:53 -0500 (EST) From: "Ketrien I. Saihr-Kenchedra" <ketrien@error404.nls.net> To: Matt Rowley <matt@arin.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 and Adaptec raidutils (again) Message-ID: <20041206183904.S88450@bahre.achedra.org> In-Reply-To: <A6125B2CFEDE2BEDF10D9FA6@elric.arin.net> References: <A6125B2CFEDE2BEDF10D9FA6@elric.arin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Matt Rowley wrote: > Sorry, I don't have a copy of the original message that went to current@... <snip> > A few other files have different license headers, copyrighted by Adaptec, > Distributed Processing Technology Corporation, and I2O Special Interest > Group. The files are: <snip> > But these licenses look identical to those in /usr/src/sys/dev/asr/i2o* in > FreeBSD's tree. > These two files: i2omodul.h i2odep.h, in raidutils-0.0.4/raideng/ have a > different I20 license that says "These header files are provided, pursuant to > your I2O SIG membership agreement"... it basically sounds like a no-warranty > disclaimer, but I don't know what the I20 SIG agreement is to which they > referring. I have to wonder at the validity of those licenses, actually. I was looking at them with relation to some i960 work I've been doing, and try as I might, the I2O SIG seems to no longer exist in any form. I'd love to find out otherwise, if only so the license can be clarified. -Ketrien I. Saihr-Kenchedra
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041206183904.S88450>