Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:50:33 +0100 From: Pierre Beyssac <beyssac@enst.fr> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iscsi initiator speed very low in FreeBSD 7 Message-ID: <20080227125033.GA35933@bofh.enst.fr> In-Reply-To: <fq3lrg$iun$2@ger.gmane.org> References: <4A66E92B3FBF8541A78CD11D1C0E3CFC491D952009@wp-ex02.hq.webpartner.dk> <20080226155813.GD75747@bofh.enst.fr> <20080226160527.GE75747@bofh.enst.fr> <fq3lrg$iun$2@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 01:45:35PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > > Better with the patch... :-) > I think you need to send a file with a .txt extension for it to pass the > spam / list filters. Here it is inline... --- isc_sm.c 2007-07-24 17:35:02.000000000 +0200 +++ /tmp/isc_sm.c 2008-02-26 16:53:54.000000000 +0100 @@ -325,7 +325,9 @@ mtx_unlock(&sp->io_mtx); // XXX } #else + mtx_lock(&sp->io_mtx); // XXX wakeup(&sp->flags); + mtx_unlock(&sp->io_mtx); // XXX #endif return error; } @@ -454,6 +456,11 @@ } } +/* + * Should be called with sp->io_mtx held to avoid race condition + * on queue empty. + * Returns with sp->io_mtx held. + */ static int proc_out(isc_session_t *sp) { @@ -481,6 +488,8 @@ if((pq = i_dqueue_snd(sp, which)) == NULL) break; + mtx_unlock(&sp->io_mtx); + pp = &pq->pdu; bhs = &pp->ipdu.bhs; switch(bhs->opcode) { @@ -523,6 +532,8 @@ xdebug("error=%d ndone=%d opcode=0x%x ccb=%p itt=%x", error, ndone, bhs->opcode, pq->ccb, ntohl(bhs->itt)); if(error == EPIPE) { + pdu_free(sp->isc, pq); + mtx_lock(&sp->io_mtx); // XXX: better do some error recovery ... break; } @@ -540,6 +551,7 @@ } if(pq->ccb == NULL || error) pdu_free(sp->isc, pq); + mtx_lock(&sp->io_mtx); } return ndone; } @@ -558,13 +570,13 @@ sp->flags |= ISC_SM_RUNNING; do { + mtx_lock(&sp->io_mtx); if(sp->flags & ISC_SM_HOLD) odone = 0; else odone = proc_out(sp); sdebug(7, "odone=%d", odone); if(odone == 0) { - mtx_lock(&sp->io_mtx); #ifdef ISC_OWAITING sp->flags |= ISC_OWAITING; #endif @@ -574,8 +586,8 @@ #ifdef ISC_OWAITING sp->flags &= ~ISC_OWAITING; #endif - mtx_unlock(&sp->io_mtx); } + mtx_unlock(&sp->io_mtx); } while(sp->flags & ISC_SM_RUN); sp->flags &= ~ISC_SM_RUNNING; -- A: Yes. Pierre Beyssac pb@enst.fr >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080227125033.GA35933>