Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 15:45:11 -0400 From: Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@halplant.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 20TB Storage System Message-ID: <20030905194511.GA4910@hal9000.halplant.com> In-Reply-To: <20030903132303.GA53246@lanczos.maths.tcd.ie> References: <20030902224136.GA98381@dan.emsphone.com> <ILENIMHFIPIBHJLCDEHKGENGDCAA.max.clark@media.net> <20030903110615.GA25233@chuggalug.clues.com> <20030903132303.GA53246@lanczos.maths.tcd.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Warning: semi-useless information ahead] On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 11:06:15AM +0000, Geoff Buckingham wrote: > However I just read the newfs man page and am intrigued to know what effect > the -g and -h options have.... Somewhere in -STABLE between 4.8-RELEASE and a month or so ago I recreated a filesystem [~50 GB] on a single disk and used these two options [-g (~8 MB) -h ~8, IIRC] and after mounting any writes would cause a panic. Other options were -U -m 1%, IIRC. At the time I didn't try to debug and just dropped those two options and made a new filesystem, then all was well. I think this was about a month or two ago. Sorry for the extreme vagueness, but I thought it better to mention it. -Andrew- -- _______________________________________________________________________ | -Andrew J. Caines- Unix Systems Engineer A.J.Caines@halplant.com | | "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary | | safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030905194511.GA4910>