Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 2 Feb 2013 15:30:00 GMT
From:      Barbara Guida <barbara.freebsd@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/175776: patching x11-servers/xorg-server fails
Message-ID:  <201302021530.r12FU0Ww098380@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/175776; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Barbara Guida <barbara.freebsd@gmail.com>
To: Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org>
Cc: Tsurutani Naoki <turutani@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, 
 freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/175776: patching x11-servers/xorg-server fails
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:25:41 +0100

 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Niclas Zeising wrote:
 > On 02/02/13 13:52, Tsurutani Naoki wrote:
 >> xorg-server-1.10.6_2,1 xorg-vfbserver-1.10.6_1,1 are installed. 
 >> All the Xorg related ports are installed after setting
 >> "WITH_NEW_XORG=1".
 >> 
 >> Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org> wrote:
 >> 
 >>> On 02/02/13 13:09, Tsurutani Naoki wrote:
 >>>> Thank you for your reply.
 >>>> 
 >>>> Both files on my host are just same with that on SVN
 >>>> repository you pointed. I think only
 >>>> "files/extra-new-arch-i386" is used with "WITH_NEW_XORG=1". 
 >>>> The file "hw/xfree86/common/compiler.h" made by "make
 >>>> extract" differs from the one expeced by the patch file (see
 >>>> line 1335 and 1371). Is there anything wrong on my host or on
 >>>> my thought ?
 >>>> 
 >>> 
 >>> Only extra-new-arch-i386 is used when compiling with
 >>> WITH_NEW_XORG. Both patches fixes the same issue, but in
 >>> different versions of xorg-server, the old and the new.  Which
 >>> version of xorg-server are getting built?  Is it the correct
 >>> one?  As I previously said, I can't reproduce this issue, and
 >>> I've been running builds for different freebsd versions of i386
 >>> both with old and new xorg during the night without problems. 
 >>> Regards! -- Niclas Zeising
 >>> 
 >> 
 > 
 > Hi! I finally managed to reproduce this, and a patch is in the
 > works.  Can you please try the attached patch?  Remember to apply
 > it with patch -E to remove empty files. Regards!
 > 
 
 It seems that extra-arch-i386 from (1) is missing, it's not created by
 the patch.
 
 (1) @ line #13 of new patch
 +EXTRA_PATCHES+=	${FILESDIR}/extra-arch-i386
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
 
 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRDS/1AAoJECfdb9Y99fdQrfQH/RZc5WaV+tM7Cvv7eWMrrF3k
 hEQKpw+DN8G0p5jPzRploAnSM9o8EcWZG+Uwmk4Aabty2bEx/20s4hVfL/H+FVap
 hTnyTSpe0lI2sewK1ZizIMmvx5HPIIWxEcCY+69tLs4HxtMPR5IyIvfzJCCfsIcV
 N4dJOnusEnHPhbUlDU2cLlz1xN3rN0hSJXJUbM1uf5MmM7Q0sklg3lAODDlGCcNq
 hKVwqBD+9CXsv8WmSotrK0lvzd2jDwh5TVZKys9npocS+A7fbEujNU1cJl64nB4t
 sGCozNNvI0tBcS6su2ZV4oswWmXKqbK+2xAOZd4JrDeA8/eYCJXO4UGG5npm41Q=
 =7aYC
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201302021530.r12FU0Ww098380>