Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 03 Feb 2006 12:39:19 +0100
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de>
To:        Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com>
Cc:        Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Any idea when Xorg 7.0's coming to FBSD?
Message-ID:  <43E340E7.1080507@cs.tu-berlin.de>
In-Reply-To: <200602030257.27685.kstewart@owt.com>
References:  <43E2E2F1.70206@u.washington.edu> <43E2F43B.1000303@u.washington.edu> <43E30BDD.9090005@cs.tu-berlin.de> <200602030257.27685.kstewart@owt.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kent Stewart schrieb:
> On Thursday 02 February 2006 23:53, Björn König wrote:
> 
>>The noticeable difference is that 7.0 takes much more time to compile
>>all in all because of its modularity. A German magazine tested both:
>>6.9 took 19 minutes and 7.0 75 minutes on their dual Opteron 246
>>machine with 2 GB RAM (source: iX 1/2006).
> 
> Differences like that usually point out a poor interaction between the 
> files and the make process. [...]

As far as I know they use the wide spreaded tools automake, autoconf, 
libtool and pkgconfig to prepare the build process. I'm sure most users 
noticed that executing ./configure takes a lot of time in many cases. It 
may be that 7.0 takes so much time because it is frequently testing 
whether strlen() exists or not. :-P

Björn





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43E340E7.1080507>