Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:33:46 -0700 From: Charlie Schluting <charlie@schluting.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw Message-ID: <410A867A.6000707@schluting.com> In-Reply-To: <20040730191015.W483-100000@prophet.alphaque.com> References: <20040730191015.W483-100000@prophet.alphaque.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dinesh Nair wrote: > by default the flow is: > > wire -> ipnat -> ipfilter -> ipfw -> kernel -> ipfilter -> ipnat ->ipfw > > the patch in the above PR changes it to: > > wire -> ipnat -> ipfilter -> ipfw -> kernel -> ipfw -> ipfilter -> ipnat Interesting! Thanks for all the great info guys. I don't really need to use the patch, since I simply want to limit my outbound bandwidth usage. The problem with my rules before was a result of not understanding that nat translation had already taken place (I think). I'll test this weekend. Thanks; -Charlie
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?410A867A.6000707>