Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 17:44:18 +1000 From: Sue Blake <sue@welearn.com.au> To: Studded <Studded@dal.net> Cc: Brett Taylor <brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: thoteditor-2.1b Message-ID: <19981006174418.60050@welearn.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3619941C.6531D06C@dal.net>; from Studded on Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 08:53:00PM -0700 References: <19981004205251.09260@welearn.com.au> <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9810051641300.7123-100000@peloton.physics.montana.edu> <19981006111413.54726@welearn.com.au> <3619941C.6531D06C@dal.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 08:53:00PM -0700, Studded wrote:
> Sue Blake wrote:
>
> > Hmmm, it's been catching people unawares in the ports collection for
> > every release since 2.2.5. Looking through the editors, this is one of
> > the more attractive looking ones that people might try first. Check the
> > -questions archives for the results.
> >
> > Of course I'd like to see it fixed but that's beyond my skills.
> > Do broken ports become immortal after 12 months or do we have a
> > euthenasia policy? :-)
>
> I'm confused. It compiles and runs just fine for me. What about it is
> broken? There is a 2.1e out so it could stand to be updated, but it's
> certainly not broken.
Can you start a new document, or open an existing document? If you can,
it's not broken and I've got a problem here, and that is good news!
--
Regards,
-*Sue*-
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981006174418.60050>