Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:19:02 +0200 From: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: device sio vs. device uart Message-ID: <200506100019.04842@harrymail>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart6199935.VPhv06Pmqh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hello, after compiling a custom kernel with device uart instead of device sio I=20 see the following in my boot message: sio0 failed to probe at port 0x3f8 irq 4 on isa0 sio1 failed to probe at port 0x2f8 irq 3 on isa0 sio2: not probed (disabled) sio3: not probed (disabled) But I don't have sio in my kernel at all. Can someone please explain me the major differences (besides the newbus=20 adaption) between sio and uart? And why is sio still in GENERIC? And of course why do I see these sio messages? Thanks in advance, =2DHarry --nextPart6199935.VPhv06Pmqh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCqMBYBylq0S4AzzwRApRQAJ0fOyTIay5DgR8pINUCieAAghf6WQCfZqcz DU9g+A+CmjEPQK0aluOoerY= =GvtU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6199935.VPhv06Pmqh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506100019.04842>