Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 08:38:39 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: tlambert2@mindspring.com Cc: Bart Kus <bsd@shell-server.com>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sio modification Message-ID: <14025.1001918319@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 30 Sep 2001 22:27:53 PDT." <3BB7FED9.D91FAA2E@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <3BB7FED9.D91FAA2E@mindspring.com>, Terry Lambert writes: >Bart Kus wrote: >> If I do have to write something, for my work to be included anywhere, I >> should be writing for the -CURRENT kernel, right? I presently run -STABLE, >> so that would obviously be the more comfortable kernel to write for...but it >> is *STABLE* after all. > >Most of us doing commercial developement write for -stable, and >give it out to be ported to -current by someone else, if we don't >have the time to do both. With the amount of code you have had to get integrated in our tree I can truly see how the workload would overwhelm you. Submissions should contain a -current version or they are likely to never make it into the tree... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14025.1001918319>