Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 08 Apr 2015 20:23:26 -0500
From:      Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru>
Cc:        svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r383191 - head/Mk
Message-ID:  <5525D48E.5090305@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150408232144.GX21982@hades.panopticon>
References:  <201504040535.t345ZJ9M028396@svn.freebsd.org> <20150408194202.GA45809@hades.panopticon> <5525A9C1.5010003@FreeBSD.org> <20150408232144.GX21982@hades.panopticon>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--Cgv6b6OHmFiKEvdRrUKFJFpIhGOg8tU24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 4/8/2015 6:21 PM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Bryan Drewery (bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) wrote:
>=20
>>>>   Re-enable and rework check added in r370464 to validate the first =
CATEGORY
>>>>   is set properly.  The problem causing the revert in r370475 was fi=
xed in
>>>>   r383190.
>>>>  =20
>>>>   With hat:	portmgr
>>>
>>> This breaks countless usecases when port is build which does not belo=
ng
>>> to the ports tree.
>>
>> Please name even 1 case.
>=20
> I have a lot of WIP ports in flat directory. Tons of custom port
> repositories on github with flat structure.

Short of more details, that does not sound like a supported setup.

I can't read your mind. Please give me a specific case or I can't help.

>=20
>> Building a port with the wrong first CATEGORY results in a broken
>> package as the origin is wrong.
>=20
> I'm not talking about wrong categories, I'm talking about ports outside=

> of the ports tree. These should build perfectly fine.
>=20
>>> Afaik, we have that information in ports - based on
>>> that PORTSDIR is chosen. The same mechanism should be used here to
>>> conditionally enable the check.
>>
>> That made no sense.
>=20
> Explain.
>=20

I do not understand what you are trying to say. It makes no sense.


--=20
Regards,
Bryan Drewery


--Cgv6b6OHmFiKEvdRrUKFJFpIhGOg8tU24
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVJdSOAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPIPMIAIf1u3nzbstzk1ss2GYGRfOJ
8/sx0P17FX/Rx8eqlp6/KfTWQlkAAGlzh9i8aJMn/yFRJLmP0cTZ+Iaxk8tB9mpc
49aOtLJu80JdBmrhNfoS+2euo5JmjuCEndbdLGZFbfu2GJkBqRA1BGe++Ydf5b5y
tZOpjcKk+UxU8A4ZUTVBB2dIieTARZkyFDF9aMP7QocytdBYt8mhrI+Bhb/zZn10
qhjztH2gB9aAhgnFVMBPa+gerWHLPfO3Q5siQSClXXeqMHb6fJEu2T50Pa0e/vSM
mvmDIzzXS2KbRCIoXdAKsGwlrx0IXB03yp7JUhKhcAl0p5ItmK2kZqfHHrsMYdw=
=16db
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Cgv6b6OHmFiKEvdRrUKFJFpIhGOg8tU24--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5525D48E.5090305>