Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 10:33:50 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Cc: itojun@iijlab.net, core@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KAME IPv6 and freebsd Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908311031530.340-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <199908310704.JAA34086@gratis.grondar.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Mark Murray wrote: > > >I'll be very happy to work with you on this one. > > > > Does it make sense to make src/crypto/sys for kernel code? > > (for IPsec we need crypto code *in kernel*). > > I wonder... > > There was a contrib/sys (where softupdates went), and that got moved > to sys/contrib. > > Perhaps something similar could be invented for src/crypto? We'd need > to make the distibution machinery understand that, but I don't see > too much a problem there. > > I have no strong feelings about src/crypto/sys or src/sys/crypto. I would prefer src/sys/crypto. I tend to have a lot of kernel-only trees around for my work and the more self-contained they are the better. Moving softupdates into sys/crypto was a good thing (IMHO). -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9908311031530.340-100000>