Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 15:36:55 -0500 (CDT) From: Tony Kimball <alk@Think.COM> To: wollman@lcs.mit.edu Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ip masquerading Message-ID: <199605202036.PAA17580@compound.Think.COM> In-Reply-To: <9605202029.AA24569@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> (message from Garrett Wollman on Mon, 20 May 1996 16:29:54 -0400)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Garrett has not spoken yet -- perhaps does not read "questions"? -- > but I wonder what his reasons are. I suspect, from other discussion, > that the point would be elegance of implementation. That's pretty close. I don't want the IP processing path cluttered with lots of nasty crap to do fifteen different non-standard actions to every packet... What if it were standardized? If there was a published masquerade RFC?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605202036.PAA17580>