Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 05:04:42 +0400 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: Atom Smasher <atom@smasher.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: intel i5 - core? or core2? Message-ID: <8639u822tx.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1008211213030.2000@smasher> (Atom Smasher's message of "Sat, 21 Aug 2010 12:19:24 %2B1200 (NZST)") References: <1008211213030.2000@smasher>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Atom Smasher <atom@smasher.org> writes: > hardware: > MACH: x86_64 (LENOVO, 4313CTO, ThinkPad T510) > CPU: x86_64 (Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 540 @ 2.53GHz) > > FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0 (amd64) > > in "/etc/make.conf" i tried setting "CPUTYPE=core" but as soon as i > start building things, lang/perl5.10 fails, complaining about "core" > not being right. > > when i change the setting to "CPUTYPE=core2" it builds fine. I'd suggest using CPUTYPE?=native and let the compiler decide what's best. Our pretty old gcc in base supports neither `core' nor `core2'. The `core2' is just an alias for `nocona'/`prescott' for amd64/i386. And `core' alias is available only for i386, cf. bsd.cpu.mk. > > is something wrong? i thought the i5 was "core", not "core2"...?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8639u822tx.fsf>