Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 08:55:49 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Andrew Thompson <andy@fud.org.nz> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: ported NetBSD if_bridge Message-ID: <20040417055549.GB81778@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20040417035758.GA66806@kate.fud.org.nz> References: <20040417035758.GA66806@kate.fud.org.nz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 03:57:58PM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote: > Hi, >=20 >=20 > I have ported over the bridging code from NetBSD and am looking for feedb= ack. > My main question is, 'do people want this in the tree?' >=20 >=20 > The benefits over the current bridge are: > * ability to manage the bridge table > * spanning tree support > * the snazzy brconfig utility > * clonable pseudo-interface (is that a benefit?) >=20 What advantages does it offer compared to the ng_bridge(4) functionality? Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAgMblUkv4P6juNwoRAtXbAKCJI14dl0D9X1E+d34G2WckNFdsngCbBrE1 OO2j0YC01K3xszpN4vZlG80= =EFld -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040417055549.GB81778>