Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 00:10:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Andrew Thompson <andy@fud.org.nz> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: ported NetBSD if_bridge Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0404170008410.66312-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20040417035758.GA66806@kate.fud.org.nz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Andrew Thompson wrote: > Hi, > > > I have ported over the bridging code from NetBSD and am looking for feedback. > My main question is, 'do people want this in the tree?' > > > The benefits over the current bridge are: > * ability to manage the bridge table > * spanning tree support > * the snazzy brconfig utility > * clonable pseudo-interface (is that a benefit?) Do we need THREE bridging systems? If you need features you culd probably add them pretty easily to one or the other of the existing bridging modules..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0404170008410.66312-100000>