Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 19:57:52 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Bob Hall <rjhjr@cox.net>, Free BSD Questions list <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Top behavior differences Message-ID: <20060911005752.GF30620@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20060910220404.GB11266@teddy.fas.com> References: <20060910125631.GA29818@teddy.fas.com> <20060910155704.GA49622@kongemord.krig.net> <20060910220404.GB11266@teddy.fas.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Sep 10), stan said: > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 11:57:05AM -0400, Bob Hall wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:56:31AM -0400, stan wrote: > > > Can someone explain to me why top's handling of multi processor > > > status display is different on FreeBSD, than it is on Linux? > > > > Possible reasons why open source software X doesn't have feature Y: > > -- Long discussion of open source philosophy dleted --- > > Once upon a time, when people posted on lists like this, they got > well reasoned technical answers. > > The question I was really asking, is if there is a technical reason > for this difference (eg difernt sturctures for obatining the > information in the 2 OS's). The reason that i feel this is an > apropriate place to ask such a question, is that top is NOT a port, > but is provided by the base OS in FreeBSD. FreeBSD does not currently track per-cpu usage, only a total. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060911005752.GF30620>