Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 20:19:59 +0100 From: "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@freebie.atkielski.com> To: "Scott Mitchell" <scott.mitchell@mail.com>, "Kevin Golding" <kevin@caomhin.demon.co.uk> Cc: "Cliff Sarginson" <cliff@raggedclown.net>, "FreeBSD Questions" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Parts I recommend (formerly "Workstation and server-market") Message-ID: <003101c196e7$22763af0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> References: <20020105195536.27073ca2.johann@broadpark.no> <20020105170230.636999bb.matthew@starbreaker.net> <20020106071439.GE1003@raggedclown.net> <0a5b01c19683$d1087880$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20020106121009.A338@localhost> <4JD6R5A1lFO8EwPI@caomhin.demon.co.uk> <20020106142306.C338@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott writes: > All of our workstations are left on permanently, > although the drives won't be doing much for half > the day... they still die more often than the SCSI > drives. Which is fine, really -- the SCSI drives > cost a lot more so I expect them to last longer :-) Manufacturers design and build better drives for SCSI, so they tend to last longer, but there is nothing inherent in SCSI itself that makes SCSI drives better, noisier, or whatever. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?003101c196e7$22763af0$0a00000a>