Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:10:39 +0700 (NSS)
From:      Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru>
To:        Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com>
Cc:        Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>, n@nectar.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: pw_class in _pw_passwd is null if __hashpw() is not called in prior
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009290006340.58344-100000@iclub.nsu.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20000928102400.A17446@dan.emsphone.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, there!

On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Dan Nelson wrote:

> > > Here is another possible trouble. While libc.so.4 with nsswitch no
> > > longer requires the magic '+' entry, libc.so.3 and earlier still
> > > require '+'.
> > 
> > IMHO, This Is A Bug.
> 
> Depends on what Seigo meant.  If he meant that libc.so.4 and no
> /etc/nsswitch.conf implicitly adds a "+" to the end of /etc/passwd,
> that's definitely a bug.  If he meant that libc.so.4 and an
> nsswitch.conf of "passwd: files nis" doesn't require a "+", that's
> fine.

"passwd: compat" should require '+' if I understand it correctly

/fjoe



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0009290006340.58344-100000>