Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:21:03 +0300 From: "Lenar D. Tukhvatullin" <blackv@netroad.ru> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Yes it did the trick - Re[3]: Re[2]: em0, VLAN and bpf(?) trouble w/RELENG_5 Message-ID: <20041113182103.GA43222@proxy.netroad.ru> In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.0.20041113113942.10365d88@64.7.153.2> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1041111133336.96784D-100000@fledge.watson.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1041113123552.42140R-100000@fledge.watson.org> <6.1.2.0.0.20041113113942.10365d88@64.7.153.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:05:30PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > I am able to create and use VLANS and putting the nic or the vlan interface > into promisc mode does not break the passing of packets. And what about bridging? Can you test bridging beetween vlan and another physical interface, for example: em1 - another physical interface, not connected to wire 172.16.0.0/24 - network in vlan (tag 100) 172.16.0.1 - remote host in this vlan # ifconfig em0 up # ifconfig vlan0 create # ifconfig vlan0 vlan 100 vlandev em0 # ifconfig vlan0 up # ifconfig em1 172.16.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 # kldload bridge # sysctl net.link.ether.bridge.config="vlan0 em1" # sysctl net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1 Pinging remote host: $ ping 172.16.0.1 -- Lenar D. Tukhvatullin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041113182103.GA43222>