Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:33:38 -0700 From: Kip Macy <kmacy@freebsd.org> To: Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NetBSD 5.0 statistics Message-ID: <3c1674c90904301133w702d98feh88457677388a0a61@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6101e8c40904300750i3e86fc0cnef09b0d4533627f7@mail.gmail.com> References: <6101e8c40904300750i3e86fc0cnef09b0d4533627f7@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> wrote: > Is the FreeBSD's FS management so slow? > > http://www.netbsd.org/~ad/50/img15.html > > Or so big is the difference between the two cpu scheduler? > > > http://www.netbsd.org/~ad/50/img0.html We would need more information about the disk hardware, amount of memory etc. to really provide an answer. We've had a lot of difficulties testing against NetBSD in the past because NetBSD wouldn't boot on recent hardware (ACPI issues IIRC). Looking at the processor he is using it would appear that that has probably been fixed. -Kip
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3c1674c90904301133w702d98feh88457677388a0a61>