Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:42:59 +0100 From: Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re[2]: docs/93014: minor nits in the project model book (dev-model) Message-ID: <1942942743.20060210164259@rulez.sk> In-Reply-To: <200602101530.k1AFUEtr095055@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200602101530.k1AFUEtr095055@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Halo Giorgos, Friday, February 10, 2006, 4:30:14 PM, si tukal: > The following reply was made to PR docs/93014; it has been noted by GNATS. > From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> > To: Ben Kaduk <minimarmot@gmail.com> > Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: docs/93014: minor nits in the project model book (dev-model) > Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:23:52 +0200 > On 2006-02-08 03:56, Ben Kaduk <minimarmot@gmail.com> wrote: >> In the project model book, I found a few minor nits whilst perusing >> its contents. >> >> One nit is the use of "to" instead of "too" on line 2209 of the source. > >> >Fix: >> --- book.sgml Wed Feb 8 02:38:24 2006 >> +++ book.sgml.orig Wed Feb 8 02:38:08 2006 >> @@ -2206,7 +2206,7 @@ >> stability cannot be sacrificed by self-imposed deadlines and >> target release dates. >> >> - For slips of time not to become too long with regards to security >> + For slips of time not to become to long with regards to security >> and stability issues, >> extra discipline is required when committing changes to -STABLE. > > Hmmm, not really. The original text is ok. "too long" refers to the > length of a time period. I'm not sure what "to long" would mean here. > looks okay to me too. -- Cheers, Daniel Gerzo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1942942743.20060210164259>