Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:14:44 +0300
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
To:        jhell <jhell@dataix.net>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: some arc_reclaim_needed stats
Message-ID:  <4BD0BC44.1040204@icyb.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <4BCEF7E4.6080606@dataix.net>
References:  <4BC86CF3.7060708@icyb.net.ua> <4BCEF7E4.6080606@dataix.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 21/04/2010 16:04 jhell said the following:
> If these are not tunable values and serve a good purpose as a stat to be
> added at some point, would they not be better in kstat.zfs.misc? rather
> than vfs.zfs so they can be collected with the rest of the stats via
> arc_summary.pl.

Yes, I agree.
But right now no one seems to think that there is anything useful about these
stats :-)

> Without seeing the thread "kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.hash_collisions" I
> had updated the arc_summary.pl script yesterday to include these under a
> "ARC Misc" section in the output. Just a FYI in case it may be useful to
> you or others.

BTW, it would be nice if hash table size (number of buckets) would be reported
too.  But that's a kernel change, not arc_summary.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BD0BC44.1040204>