Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 5 Jan 2008 22:26:51 +0100
From:      Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@gmail.com>
To:        Rong-en Fan <grafan@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: removing kH and *6 from xterm
Message-ID:  <20080105212651.GA7006@roadrunner.spoerlein.net>
In-Reply-To: <6eb82e0801051021s7161766bm6b98bbdc5b9e8748@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <6eb82e0801021747w73a04d5ckc0a7ef623a806302@mail.gmail.com> <20080104180429.GA1496@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> <6eb82e0801051021s7161766bm6b98bbdc5b9e8748@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 06.01.2008 at 02:21:47 +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2008 2:04 AM, Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I wonder, though, how do I activate the change? I changed /etc/termcap,
> > opened a new xterm but mutt's behaviour hasn't changed ...
> 
> I'm proposing the following change:
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~rafan/termcap-xterm.diff
> 
> which removes kH, *6 from xterm and adds @8 (enter key) to it.
> 
> Any objections?

I'm running with the exact same patch right now, and after cap_mkdb
(Thanks Erik!) the keys in mutt work like expected.

I don't know what side-effects this may cause, but wider testing on
-CURRENT could probably be fine?

Cheers,
Ulrich Spoerlein
-- 
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool,
than to speak, and remove all doubt.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080105212651.GA7006>