Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 08:54:34 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is anybody actually able to netboot at the moment? Message-ID: <20020123085434.B1806@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20020122234007.1983E3BAD@overcee.wemm.org>; from peter@wemm.org on Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:40:07PM -0800 References: <3C4DEB7A.59E87BD3@mindspring.com> <20020122234007.1983E3BAD@overcee.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:40:07PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > Terry Lambert wrote: > > Andrew Gallatin wrote: > I have experimented with alignment in the ethernet frame send code.. it > seems that we are trying to send with 2-byte alignment for the bootp case. > Fixing it doesn't seem to make much difference. However, I wonder if SRM > is doing some length rounding or something because the lengths are not 4 or > 8 byte multiples for the bootp queries but are for the working rarp > queries. However, even that doesn't make sense because it sometimes works. > I'm more suspicious of interactions between the tulip cards when being > driven by SRM and the switch at the moment. Try setting ewa0_mode=fast in SRM. Maybe that helps. Sometimes autoneg on SRM just gets it wrong. -- | / o / /_ _ email: wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020123085434.B1806>