Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 17 Apr 2004 11:13:48 +0800 (CST)
From:      Tai-hwa Liang <avatar@mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw>
To:        Alex Vasylenko <lxv@omut.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: /usr/bin/less weird memory consumption?
Message-ID:  <040417111109E.70184@www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw>
In-Reply-To: <408098A7.6090407@omut.org>
References:  <040416140449E.61901@www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw> <408098A7.6090407@omut.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Alex Vasylenko wrote:
> Tai-hwa Liang wrote:
> >   Anyone tried to view a file contains *hugh* line with /usr/bin/less in
> > -CURRENT?
> >
> > Sample file:
> >
> > 	dd if=/dev/zero bs=512 count=1500 | tr '\00' ' ' > test.txt
> >
> >   On my -CURRENT box cvsup'd this morning, "/usr/bin/less text.txt" consumes
> > about 511 MBytes of memory(see 'top'). -STABLE(less 358) and less 381 on
> > Debian doesn't seem to have such problem, though.
>
> There's a memory leak. The latest less (382) doesn't have this problem.
> Use attached patch.
>

That works like a charm! Any chance would this patch being committed into
the tree?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?040417111109E.70184>