Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:52:25 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: peter@wemm.org Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: getsysfd() patch #1 (Re: Virtual memory question) Message-ID: <200301222052.h0MKqP4N041427@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20030122041546.393AF2A8A5@canning.wemm.org> References: <200301220304.h0M34TMB099694@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <20030122041546.393AF2A8A5@canning.wemm.org> you write: >I'd rather do that than add another arg to the memfd syscall. Otherwise >we're heading into shm_open() look and feel territory. Hmm. I wonder if >the POSIX folks would object to us calling the syscall shm_openfd() ? Can you please explain just what precisely your problem is with shm_open()? If we're going to reinvent the wheel, please, let's skip the square and hexagonal stages. - -GAWollman -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+LwSHI+eG6b7tlG4RAj56AKCFhYoHdkXhvIX1sGPX9PgXB2dttwCgiR75 53DaDGocAf2aI5F7xR09398= =sswO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200301222052.h0MKqP4N041427>