Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:15:47 -0500 From: David Sze <dsze@distrust.net> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux Message-ID: <20050620151547.GA21151@mail.distrust.net> In-Reply-To: <20050620160522.C26664@fledge.watson.org> References: <746fd037f6ca8131a8fb8938f1e346e9@lonres.com> <20050610170537.GA67849@bibipentium.lonres.com> <20050611085604.J75625@fledge.watson.org> <20050616161506.GB28794@bibipentium.lonres.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20050617091736.05949298@mail.distrust.net> <20050619165349.U6413@fledge.watson.org> <6.2.1.2.2.20050620102441.06372a70@mail.distrust.net> <20050620160522.C26664@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 04:08:45PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > > I realize every additional variation increases the testing load, but I'd > be interested in seeing linuxthreads performance on 5.x/6.x also. While > we've worked hard to improve native threading, linuxthreading remains > fully functional, and given that MySQL may well be being optimized based > on assumptions regarding the Linux threading model, it could well be > linuxthreads comes in ahead on recent versions. linuxthreads actually doesn't compile for amd64. I can try i386 versions of 5.4 and 6.0 too; that will delay the results by a couple more days though (I'm doing this in my spare time, though using work hardware).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050620151547.GA21151>