Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:42:57 +0100
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= <rene@freebsd.org>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        arm@freebsd.org, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: signal 11 after kernel update r247742 -> r248706
Message-ID:  <51557031.8080404@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=X3s-oY2nQSjDPEHStgHYxy=5Uh0QXgKXyRgTZd_MeNA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <51545932.9050901@freebsd.org> <1364484652.36972.81.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <515466B5.4020403@freebsd.org> <CAJ-Vmo=X3s-oY2nQSjDPEHStgHYxy=5Uh0QXgKXyRgTZd_MeNA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28-03-2013 17:16, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Is that commit before or after the unbuffered VM commit?
>
Looking at the svn diff, the unbuffered VM commit seemed to happen in
between (together with the VM_OBJECT_* splitup, a bunch of arm
optimizations, and new callout).

René



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51557031.8080404>