Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 15:33:41 -0500 From: Robert Hough <rch@qserve.net> To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cucipop port/source Message-ID: <4.3.1.2.20000530152814.01faa3f0@qserve.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.00.10005301552380.9983-100000@super-g.inch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 04:06 PM 5/30/00 -0400, you wrote: >With yet another QPopper bug, we're thinking of moving to cucipop. I did the same thing yesterday... >-how do you like it? So far, it's been great (The whole 24 hours we've had it running). In fact, it's already proven to me that it's faster under heavier loads. It also seems to be faster if the mail has large file attachments as well. Though, it could just be that "new toy syndrome" I tend to get when I install something with little to no problems in the process. :) >-any gotchas or incompatibilities in your userbase when you made the move? I just replaced the proper lines in my inetd.conf, restarted inetd, and away it went. Haven't had any problems as of yet. >-did you get db support working? No. I got the same error you got. I didn't play with this too much though, as this really didn't seem to add any serious benefits that I needed. All said and done, I think this was a pretty good move on my part, and I'm still wondering why I've allowed qpopper to infest my system for so long. -- Robert Hough (rch@qserve.net) Qserve Internet, Inc. http://www.qserve.net/ Ph: (317)802-3036 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.1.2.20000530152814.01faa3f0>