Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 06:14:31 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> Cc: Billy Thompson <billy@idiom.com>, freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A contest about to start... Message-ID: <25214.897743671@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 13 Jun 1998 15:00:07 %2B0200." <19980613150007.19878@follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Having both is overkill. As for which one is the best - there are > pros and cons of both. The default clipboard vs X handling in XEmacs > sucks, for instance. I'd say to let the person building the desktop > decide, but setting the rules is really up to Jordan :-) The reason I didn't include xemacs was the simple reason that it's just waaaaay too huge. I don't want testing a theme to take each judge an hour while all the packages it depended on loaded. :-) And yes, I think one emacs is enough. I'm not knocking xemacs, and I've seen some of its nifty features, I just wanted to include at least one of each "representative" type of editor. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25214.897743671>