Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 19:42:05 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Nevermind <never@nevermind.kiev.ua> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org, Konstantin.Chuguev@dante.org.uk Subject: Re: libiconv (GNU iconv) && iconv-2.0 binary compatibility Message-ID: <3C7FBD6D.2110D44@FreeBSD.org> References: <20020228120357.GB23874@nevermind.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nevermind wrote: > > Hello, > > I've noted that php4 won't work with iconv-2.0 for some reason. > I'm compiling php4 not from ports, but it fails on trying to start > apache with error: > > # /usr/local/apache/bin/apachectl restart > /usr/local/apache/bin/apachectl restart: httpd not running, trying to start > Syntax error on line 279 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf: > Cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/libphp4.so into server: /usr/local/apache/libexec/libphp4.so: Undefined symbol "iconv_module_entry" > /usr/local/apache/bin/apachectl restart: httpd could not be started > > I'd like to know if it is safe to move giconv.h -> iconv.h and > libgiconv.so -> libiconv.so. Are they binary compatible? No, they currently aren't. > Or what is the best solution in this case? Recompile with right iconv, I guess. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C7FBD6D.2110D44>