Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:38:44 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: Ben Kaduk <minimarmot@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: docs/93014: minor nits in the project model book (dev-model) Message-ID: <20060210163844.GB11095@flame.pc> In-Reply-To: <47d0403c0602100816y6f15451coeb1f0e375339d883@mail.gmail.com> References: <200602101530.k1AFUEtr095055@freefall.freebsd.org> <1942942743.20060210164259@rulez.sk> <47d0403c0602100816y6f15451coeb1f0e375339d883@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006-02-10 10:16, Ben Kaduk <minimarmot@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2/10/06, Daniel Gerzo <[1]danger@rulez.sk> wrote: >>>> - For slips of time not to become too long with regards to security >>>> + For slips of time not to become to long with regards to security >>>> and stability issues, extra discipline is required when committing changes to -STABLE. >>> >>> Hmmm, not really. The original text is ok. "too long" refers to the >>> length of a time period. I'm not sure what "to long" would mean here. >>> >> >> looks okay to me too. > > I guess I should apologize -- I made this diff hastily, and put the > arguments in the wrong order -- the original text has "to long," > I am proposing to change it to "too long". Unless I'm > misunderstanding you, here. Oh crap! I didn't notice that the filenames were reverse. No need to apologize at all; it was me being hasty. Committed now, thanks :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060210163844.GB11095>