Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 05:01:34 +0100 From: Daniel Bye <freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw Message-ID: <20060415040134.GE47768@catflap.slightlystrange.org> In-Reply-To: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGGENJHEAA.fbsd@a1poweruser.com> References: <20060415030207.GD47768@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGGENJHEAA.fbsd@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--9crTWz/Z+Zyzu20v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 11:22:26PM -0400, fbsd wrote: > you are wrong in giving this guy incorrect info. > ipfw can be run just by adding correct statement to rc.conf > it does not have to be compiled into kernel > maybe you should read the firewall section first before giving > advice Ack. You are quite right. To the OP - you do not need to include the options in your kernel. However, doing so will not damage your health. It is personal preference on my part, and I foolishly allowed that to taint the information I offered. However, I now feel suitably castigated for my ebullience... Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: ftp://ftp.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey/dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --9crTWz/Z+Zyzu20v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEQHAeixf5fBYiFmoRAiVxAKDce0039ghNeARUtn8OPe2261jtVQCghll/ NhSV2ly7k97EoLTX5hHAUmY= =bNfT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9crTWz/Z+Zyzu20v--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060415040134.GE47768>