Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Sep 1999 15:10:53 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Peter Dufault <dufault@hda.com>
To:        wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman)
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals
Message-ID:  <199909061910.PAA07976@hda.hda.com>
In-Reply-To: <199909061544.LAA03251@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> from Garrett Wollman at "Sep 6, 99 11:44:31 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Anything that knows about sigset_t will already be using the POSIX
> macros for it, since sigset_t was a POSIX invention.  The old
> `sigmask'-style functions don't have such an API, so they need to be
> left as-is.  (Such programs would not know about high-numbered signals
> anyway, so this is no great loss.)

OK, given this my attempt to force everyone to the POSIX style
is misguided.

Peter

-- 
Peter Dufault (dufault@hda.com)   Realtime development, Machine control,
HD Associates, Inc.               Safety critical systems, Agency approval


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909061910.PAA07976>