Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:56:56 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: dougb@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: [RFC] script for binding ARP <-> IP pairs Message-ID: <20090825.095656.100103076.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4A93351E.2020107@FreeBSD.org> References: <4A806D17.9020404@delphij.net> <4A933294.8000906@delphij.net> <4A93351E.2020107@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Tue_Aug_25_09_56_56_2009_980)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote in <4A93351E.2020107@FreeBSD.org>: do> Xin LI wrote: do> > Any objections for the attached patch? I'll commit this version if do> > everybody is happy with it and then see if re@ would approve it for do> > 8.0-RELEASE. do> do> Sorry if I wasn't clear before, but all of the rc.conf variables do> should be prepended with static_arp_ (as opposed to just arp_). So do> rather than arp_args you'd want static_arp_args. I realize you're not do> using set_rcvar() but it's still a good idea to do that for do> consistency's sake, as well as to make it easier for admins to sort do> stuff, etc. Please make sure you change that in the man page as well. I agree with this. do> Silly question that I'm sorry just occurred to me right now, have you do> tested this with IPv6? :) IPv6 uses NDP (see ndp(8)), not ARP, so no consideration is needed for $static_arp_* variables at least. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Aug_25_09_56_56_2009_980)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkqTNtgACgkQTyzT2CeTzy1RQgCgoI8eVDIzSRi1VE6NriNC0MkE +UoAniivQQydtDeu1Rs6niS8dzKhhVoC =9C3s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Aug_25_09_56_56_2009_980)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090825.095656.100103076.hrs>