Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 09:56:01 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org> To: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> Cc: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r311414 - head/www/pecl-APC Message-ID: <510CAA71.3030906@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgki3y0NkOd19zYuEUv6P%2BPfPdSCApH1OxOa=XO18GeuLA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201302020346.r123kLer085367@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgki3y0NkOd19zYuEUv6P%2BPfPdSCApH1OxOa=XO18GeuLA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02.02.2013 8:47, Eitan Adler wrote:> IMHO this keeping of the wrong version number is confusing and wrong. > It makes it more difficult to determine which upstream version is > being referenced. Further, for a user that knows that .14 was > withdrawn it makes this port seems bogus. > > In this case nothing is wrong with PORTEPOCH and we should not have an > allergy to it. > > I agree. Bumping PORTEPOCH is the right way. There is no 3.1.14 on http://pecl.php.net/package/APC and people may have impression that it is fake local version. Moreover you can't avoid PORTEPOCH bumping in any case when fixed 3.1.14 will be re-issued.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?510CAA71.3030906>