Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 22:25:43 -0400 From: "Thomas S. Crum - AAA Web Solution, Inc." <tscrum@aaawebsolution.com> To: "'Jack L. Stone'" <jacks@sage-american.com> Cc: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: RE: limiting bandwith Message-ID: <003401c421c7$ccf8c340$6466a8c0@wolf> In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20040413120905.01f334c8@10.0.0.15>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0035_01C421A6.45E72340 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Also, Luigi has a helpful tutorial at http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ip_dummynet/ Best, Thomas S. Crum Senior Technical Associate tscrum@aaawebsolution.com Toll-free: (800) 834-0626 AAA Web Solution, Inc. 11924 W Forest Hill Boulevard Building 22 - Mailstop 200 Wellington, FL 33414 USA Providing full-service website design, maintenance, hosting, and marketing. No task is too small or enterprise too large for us to help you! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jack L. Stone Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 1:09 PM To: Luigi Rizzo; Ludo Koren Cc: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limiting bandwith TopPost: Hi, Luigi & List: Pardon me for tagging along on this thread, but my question is somewhat related. Being a newbie to using dummynet, I haven't yet figured how to chose & apply the proper "weight" which ranges from 1-100. The man pages are very brief on this and I haven't seen anything else in my searches. Any tips appreciated.... At 09:17 AM 4.13.2004 -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >i think it is pilot error. > >Be warned that dynamic rules only match addresses and ports, >so once a rule is installed it will match traffic both >in and out. >If you want to select on other attributes you have to do >it before you hit any keep-state or check-state rule. > >I don't know if it matches recent reports about dummynet on 5.2.1 >giving half the bandwidth, but i just checked locally and it >does work as expected -- the bandwidth is correct (with a correct >ipfw config, that is :) > > cheers > luigi > Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Administrator Sage American http://www.sage-american.com jacks@sage-american.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ------=_NextPart_000_0035_01C421A6.45E72340--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?003401c421c7$ccf8c340$6466a8c0>