Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:46:50 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@asme.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, samy@kerneled.org Subject: Re: The recent TIOCREMOTE removal Message-ID: <20041227214649.GB40679@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20041223045854.GA2637@nagual.pp.ru> References: <41CA6B7A.5040500@asme.org> <20041223045854.GA2637@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 07:58:55AM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > >Ignoring the fact that many operating systems have TIOCREMOTE implemented > > >(meaning, FreeBSD provides a nice new portability issue for now and the > > >unknowing future), several ports are *already* broken due to this. > > > > I'm only aware of two ? And I'm currently investigating them. > > TIOCREMOTE removal should be backed out by any means. It is intensively > used in emulators etc. Try to search google to see how many. No responce? In that case I plan to back this change out by myself (after few days timeout for reply). -- http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041227214649.GB40679>