Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 12:45:51 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) Cc: patl@asimov.volant.org, chuckr@eng.umd.edu, kelly@fsl.noaa.gov, gryphon@healer.com, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, julian@ref.tfs.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, terry@lambert.org Subject: Re: ports startup scripts Message-ID: <199509211945.MAA09251@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199509211842.UAA25123@keltia.Freenix.FR> from "Ollivier Robert" at Sep 21, 95 08:42:00 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > fs > > Subdir for each installed loadable filesystem type > > (hsfs, nfs, proc, ufs) Each subdir (except proc) > > contains an executable binary named 'mount'. (proc > > is empty.) > > That's stupid to put binaries in /etc. /sbin is supposed to be here to help > getting rid of these binaries. I agree. /sbin/fs. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509211945.MAA09251>