Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 07:54:09 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> To: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Cc: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/rm rm.1 rm.c Message-ID: <20041004145409.0B4C35D04@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 04 Oct 2004 16:40:41 %2B0200." <xzpr7oey2ae.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) > Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 16:40:41 +0200 > Sender: owner-cvs-all@freebsd.org > > Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> writes: > > It didn't mention which standard, and I guess from the lack of citation > > that you have that information to hand either. > > And this is where you'd be wrong. Check the Austin Group mailing list > archives and the SCU Defect Report in Aardvark. This issue has been > discussed on and off since April 2003. As far as I can tell, the > resolution was that "the wording in the current version of the > standard does not allow this, but future versions will." Look! I might or might not care about the actual change, but this needs a REAL commit message. I don't really care if a change is right or wrong (or, more likely, somewhere in between), there is no excuse for a meaningless commit message. Please do a forced commit with a real log entry! Then we can get back to the discussion of its appropriateness. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041004145409.0B4C35D04>