Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 00:10:25 -0700 (PDT) From: AMAKAWA Shuhei <sa264@cam.ac.uk> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/58142: science/mpb shouldn't libdepend on math/blas Message-ID: <200310240710.h9O7APUQ015034@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/58142; it has been noted by GNATS. From: AMAKAWA Shuhei <sa264@cam.ac.uk> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/58142: science/mpb shouldn't libdepend on math/blas Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:04:51 +0100 At Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:34:20 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > Thanks for the notification; yes, it seems that both the math/blas and > math/lapack ports install versions of the blas library. > > However, the math/blas port installs a libblas.1 library, while > math/lapack installs libblas.2; such a change in shared libraries' > version numbers usually indicates an API change or major internal > overhauls. Can you verify that the science/mpb port actually works with > the libblas.2 library installed by the math/lapack port? If so, I will > commit your science/mpb/Makefile patch. There is no API change in BLAS. It's the same fortran reference implementation. I don't believe mpb port was made with actual testing. We are using mpb fine, but with a bit more modifications. Could you look at the following please. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=58337 And this if possible. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=58335
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200310240710.h9O7APUQ015034>