Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 01:54:24 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Denis Borisov <denb@front.ru> Cc: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When will implemented in-kernel NAT? Message-ID: <20030817085424.GA49865@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200308121426.11858.denb@front.ru> References: <200308121426.11858.denb@front.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 02:26:11PM +0400, Denis Borisov wrote: > In comments in file ip_fw2.c i read:=20 > * Dynamic rules can be used for different purposes: > * + stateful rules; > * + enforcing limits on the number of sessions; > * + in-kernel NAT (not implemented yet) >=20 > When will implemented in-kernel NAT? Don't know about ipfw, but ipfilter apparently supports it (man ipnat). Kris --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/P0K/Wry0BWjoQKURAvuyAJ4gXsKkwKQnLTQQzJUHuX9DNIud8QCdGPec heHuajd4JufYUcyRJYp/5/Q= =y+G4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030817085424.GA49865>