Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 22:00:14 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@flat.berklix.net> To: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Survey Message-ID: <200605222000.k4MK0Ef9005932@fire.jhs.private> In-Reply-To: Message from Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <itetcu@freebsd.org> of "Mon, 22 May 2006 13:48:37 %2B0300." <20060522134837.0b88d705@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> And it's not only HR lack problem, we would need more hardware for the > package building cluster too. A lot of us run 24/7 netted servers with spare cycles, & wouldn't be averse to allocating the idle loop to package building for freebsd.org, but 3 problems: - package building at prsent gets done on that trusted cluster, - needs root for lots of buils, which many of us dont want to give out (sandboxes / chroot maybe ? ) - freebsd.org would need to know none of our client servers had `slipped it a mickey', which would best be protected against by anonymisining I guess, so we didnt even know what we were compiling. - It'd need some mechanised automation, like SETI A nice project for some Summer Of Code student this summer ? -- Julian Stacey. Consultant Unix Net & Sys. Eng., Munich. http://berklix.com Mail in Ascii, HTML=spam. Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605222000.k4MK0Ef9005932>