Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 05:26:21 +0900 From: Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> To: asmodai@bart.nl Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 10th patch] Message-ID: <20000114052621L.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20000113205438.C20217@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <20000114044825G.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> <20000113205438.C20217@lucifer.bart.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > bindresvport_sa() > > realhostname_sa() > > I really prefer the _sa versions because the naming is less ambiguous > from the 2 appended versions. I prefer self describing names too. If there is no strong opinion, I'll just apply *_sa(). > I wonder what the others think. Has this been standardised somewhere > already or are we now still in a phase, do what you want and after that > we'll make a IPv6 API standard? > > Thanks for doing this shin. Thanks for commenting it Asmodai. (:-) Yoshinobu Inoue To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000114052621L.shin>