Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 11:48:15 PDT From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com> To: cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/ghostscript5 ... Message-ID: <97Jun14.114823pdt.177512@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> BTW, should we nuke ghostscript4 ??? Does somebody know if any
> port needs gs4 ???
% awk -F\| '$9 ~ /ghostscript/ {print $1,"depends on",$9}' INDEX
tkhylafax-3.0 depends on Xaw3d-1.3 bash-1.14.7 ghostscript-4.03 gv-3.5.3 hylafax-4.0.1 jpeg-6a tcl-7.6 tiff-3.4 tk-4.2
wb-1.59 depends on ghostscript-4.03
apsfilter-4.9.3 depends on ghostscript-4.03 jpeg-6a netpbm-94.3.1 tiff-3.3 transfig-3.1.2 xpm-3.4j
gwstat depends on ImageMagick-3.8.6 apache-1.2.0 ghostscript-4.03 jbigkit-0.9 jpeg-6a mpeg_lib-1.1 perl-5.004 png-0.89c tiff-3.3 wwwstat-2.01 xmgr-3.01
As long as they haven't changed the render-into-X-window interface, wb
should be able to use ghostscript5. I can't comment on the others.
(But this does raise the question of why doesn't ghostview depend on
ghostscript?)
Bill
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?97Jun14.114823pdt.177512>