Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:27:03 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: kudzu@tenebras.com Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finishing up the xen port - would funding help? Message-ID: <d763ac660908251527t4596bb24u97fef5684351db2e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A933B27.1080501@tenebras.com> References: <d763ac660908220617h2d2a794ajb3a401d7402a4324@mail.gmail.com> <14889119.2221251120185215.JavaMail.root@zim.freshx.de> <d763ac660908240659w7b1e2575g9ee4152e6b58df56@mail.gmail.com> <ade45ae90908241040l313c59cfw3c2561901833d209@mail.gmail.com> <m2y6p8bvjh.wl%randy@psg.com> <4A933B27.1080501@tenebras.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ok, there's enough interest at the moment for me to dedicate some cycles again. As I said earlier, my main concern isn't getting the port up to date, its making certain that there's enough support and investment from interested parties in making sure its kept alive. Let me organise some kind of portable Xen hacking device.. Adrian 2009/8/25 Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>: > Randy Bush wrote: >>> I've kept quiet, but I wonder why we're feeding penguins for dom0, >>> when netbsd has dom0 support since 4.0 > > For my part, I am much more concerned with getting a working domU > for i386 and amd64 than with *BSD as a dom0. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d763ac660908251527t4596bb24u97fef5684351db2e>