Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:17:38 +0100 From: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> To: "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@stonehenge.com> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/144502: mail/spamd port insists on fdescfs mount Message-ID: <4B93FBD2.8060903@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <86y6i4t0ql.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> References: <201003071750.o27Ho2SW027882@freefall.freebsd.org> <4B93F758.2020508@infracaninophile.co.uk> <86y6i4t0ql.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> writes:
>
> Matthew> Anyhow, if STD{IN,OUT,ERR} is sufficient for obspamd then the test in
> Matthew> the init script could be reduced to
>
> Matthew> if [ -c /dev/fd/0 ] ; then
>
> Matthew> Otherwise, testing for fdescfs is correct.
>
> I don't know whether fd's higher than 2 are required. So maybe the
> description and instructions should be left as is for now.
>
Yes, fd's higher than 2 are required.
I implemented the check for fdescfs with this thread in mind.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2006-November/002744.html
--
Regards,
olli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B93FBD2.8060903>